Web3 grant application checklist: 30 things to check
Updated 6 min readBy the web3grant editors
Use this grant application checklist before you send any Web3 grant application: 30 checks in seven groups, from confirming the program is open to setting up the wallet that receives the money. Each item is one line. Skip an item only if the program doesn't ask for it, and fix any item that fails before you submit.
Key takeaways
- Check status first. As of October 31, 2026, 80 of the 99 programs in web3grant's directory are always open, 7 have an open round and 12 are closed between rounds.
- Many rejections are preventable: the Tezos Foundation approved 8% of applications in 2023, mostly because they were incomplete or did not match the ecosystem's needs.
- 55 of the 99 programs (56%) pay in milestone tranches, so the budget and milestone checks carry real money.
- Compliance takes time: identity checks and a signed agreement usually come before the first payment, and Tezos Foundation paperwork takes about four more weeks after acceptance.
- Keep a copy of everything you submit; reviewers will ask about the exact text they read.
How to use this checklist
Copy the numbered list into your notes and tick each item against the program's own page, not from memory. Items 1 to 6 come before you write a word; items 7 to 26 apply to the draft; items 27 to 30 cover submission and the weeks after. If someone else on your team can run the check, have them do it: a fresh reader catches mismatched numbers and broken links faster than the author.
Before you write
These six checks decide whether the application is worth writing at all. Of 222 programs web3grant checked in October 2026, 123 didn't make the directory, so start from the program's own channel, as how to find Web3 grants explains. Some problems no checklist fixes: Rocket Pool's grants committee, short of funds, declined every application in Round 41.
- The program is open today, or takes rolling applications, according to its official site rather than a third-party list.
- Its site, forum or repository shows awards or replies to applicants in the last few months.
- You meet every eligibility rule: chain, project stage, location, age and type of applicant.
- Your project matches at least one stated focus area, priority or open RFP.
- Your costed scope fits inside the published grant range, ideally well below the ceiling.
- You know the deadline in UTC and it is in your calendar; Rocket Pool's monthly rounds, for example, close on the 7th at 23:59 UTC.
The proposal
Six checks on the proposal itself. The proposal writing guide explains each section, and the proposal template has them ready to copy.
- The first paragraph says what you will ship, for whom, by when and for how much.
- Every claim about the problem, users, traction or past work links to evidence a reviewer can open.
- The ecosystem section names what this chain gains, not just that it is fast or cheap.
- You used the program's template where one exists and filled in every field; Conflux, for example, requires its Integration Grants template in full.
- Length and format match the program: page limits, PDF or web form, and video length (OpenSats asks for a video of exactly two minutes on its application page).
- No placeholders, no other program's or chain's name, and no facts a tool made up.
Budget and milestones
Six checks on money and delivery. Details are in the Web3 grant budget and milestone-based grants guides.
- Each budget line has a basis: hours times rate, a quote or a fixed fee.
- The budget total, the sum of milestone amounts and the amount in the form are the same number.
- Nothing in the budget is on the program's exclusion list, such as salaries at Ink's Spark grants or entity fees at MoonDAO.
- Each milestone has a deliverable, acceptance criteria, evidence, a due date and an amount.
- The proposal states the currency you priced in, the currency you expect to be paid in, and how you handle token price moves.
- The timeline fits the program's limits; Stellar Community Fund tranches, for example, must each be submitted within 90 days.
Team and links
Four checks that show you can deliver. Reviewers fund people as much as plans: Circle looks for founders with a record of shipping, and Btrust's Starter Grant asks for at least one merged, non-trivial pull request.
- Each team member has a role, weekly hours on the project and links to shipped work.
- Repositories are public, or the proposal gives the date they will be, with a license file.
- References are ready if the program asks for them: two letters for OpenSats, three for Btrust's Open-Source Cohort, at least one for Maelstrom.
- Every link works in a private browser window, including demos, dashboards and contract addresses.
Compliance: KYC, entity and wallet
Four checks that stop an approved grant from stalling before payment. Approval and payment are separate steps: Starknet, for example, pays only after KYC and a signed grant agreement. See KYC for crypto grants for what identity checks involve.
- Everyone who must pass KYC or KYB can do so; the Stellar Community Fund checks every contributor.
- You know which person or entity signs the agreement and receives the money; Filecoin Open Grants require them to be the same party, though their reviews look stalled since April 2026.
- You control a self-custodied wallet on the right network, plus any tokens the program requires; Metaplex DAO asks for 200 MPLX and a self-custodied Solana wallet.
- Conflicts of interest and other funding applications for the same work are disclosed, as Rocket Pool and Tezos Commons ask.
Submitting
Two checks at the moment you submit. web3grant never takes applications, and no legitimate program charges a fee to review one.
- You are submitting through the link on the program's official site, and nobody has asked you for a fee; read crypto grant scams if anything looks off.
- You submit at least a day before the deadline and keep a copy of the exact text, files and confirmation; STON.fi, for example, sends an acknowledgment email.
After submitting
Two checks for the weeks after. The median time to a decision in web3grant's directory is 4 weeks, mostly estimated from each program's process, so plan on a month of waiting.
- You watch your email and the program's forum or issue thread, and answer reviewer questions within a day or two; the dYdX Grants Program screens applications within about seven days, and Zcash's community gets at least a week to comment.
- If the answer is no, you ask which criterion you missed and note the next window before you reapply after a grant rejection.
FAQ
What documents do you need for a Web3 grant application?
A Web3 grant application usually needs a written proposal, a milestone plan, a budget, and links to your code, product and past work. Some programs ask for more: OpenSats wants two reference letters and a two-minute video, Nosana expects a pitch deck, demo and roadmap, and the Tezos Foundation wants everything in a single PDF. Identity documents come later, at the KYC stage.
How early should you submit a grant application before the deadline?
Submit a grant application at least a day before the deadline, and earlier for programs with public discussion. Deadlines are usually set in UTC, such as Rocket Pool's 23:59 UTC on the 7th of each month. Zcash Community Grants give the community at least a week to comment, and Shutter DAO's first round required at least a week of forum discussion before its vote.
Do you need a legal entity to apply for a Web3 grant?
Many Web3 grant programs accept individuals without a legal entity. VeChain's VeBetter grants make an entity optional, though VeBetter activity was very low in 2026, and Zcash Community Grants fund independent individuals. Other programs target organizations: the Hashgraph Association funds startups, enterprises and government institutions. Whoever signs the grant agreement usually must also receive the payment, so decide that before applying.
What happens after you submit a Web3 grant application?
After you submit a Web3 grant application, most programs screen it, review it technically, and invite promising applicants to a call before deciding. The median decision time in web3grant's directory is 4 weeks, mostly estimated. If you are approved, you complete KYC and sign an agreement before payment. The questions grant reviewers ask guide helps you prepare for the call.
Programs in this guide
Where each one stands today, soonest deadline first.
- Rocket Pool GMC grantsRocket Pool DAOFunds are tight. Round 41 declined every application, Round 40 approved 1 of 10, and nothing above $7,500 has been approved since May 2026.Undisclosed6 days
- Stellar Community FundStellar Development FoundationUp to $150K7 days
- OpenSats General FundOpenSatsUndisclosed29 days
- Conflux Integration GrantsConflux FoundationUndisclosedAnytime
- dYdX Grants ProgramdYdX FoundationUndisclosedAnytime
- Filecoin Open GrantsFilecoin FoundationReviews look stalled: proposals filed since April 2026 have had no reply from the Foundation. Filecoin now steers priority work to its ProPGF and RetroPGF tracks.Up to $50KAnytime
- Metaplex DAO GrantsMetaplex DAOUndisclosedAnytime
- STON.fi DEX GrantsSTON.fiUp to $10KAnytime
- Tezos Foundation GrantsTezos FoundationUndisclosedAnytime
- Zcash Community GrantsZcash Community GrantsUp to $750KAnytime
Related guides
- How to apply for Web3 grants: a step-by-step guideHow to apply for Web3 grants in 11 steps, from checking a program is open to KYC and milestone payouts, with real processes from SCF, Zcash and Solana.
- Web3 grant proposal template (copy and adapt)A free Web3 grant proposal template with 12 sections to copy, a filled-in fictional example, and variants for DAO forum posts and RFP responses.
- How to write a grant milestone reportHow to write a grant milestone report: the seven parts reviewers check, public vs private reports, a fill-in template and reporting rules from 10 programs.
- KYC for crypto grants: what's asked and whyKYC for crypto grants: why funders check identity, what individuals and companies submit, when it happens, data privacy and options for pseudonymous builders.